back to top |
Background
Climate change will have a significant impact on the power generation sector. However, policy responses and market circumstances vary from country to country, making it difficult to develop and implement strategy in an integrated way.
The Client
A major global generation company owning over 5,000 MW of thermal generation capacity in Australasia, Europe and the Americas.
The Brief
Working with stakeholders in six countries and three continents, to help develop a strategic plan for climate change.
E3's Response
The scope of work included:
Outcome
The project resulted in a step change in senior management awareness of the implications of climate-change policy and market developments on the business.
The company also gained a clear framework to guide their strategy response.
back to top |
Background
Climate-change policy poses a significant challenge to iron and steel manufacturers across the world - to reduce their environmental footprint while retaining their national and international competitiveness.
The Client
A major steel manufacturer
The Brief
To understand:
E3's Response
Over several months E3 International worked with senior management to facilitate:
We also:
Outcome
The company achieved a shared understanding of how climate-change policy would impact on its business. It established its policy preferences and commenced implementation of its corporate greenhouse strategy.
back to top |
Background
Understanding the fluctuation in prices in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme is important for developing intelligent power and carbon-hedging strategies.
The Client
A European power company
The Brief
To gain an understanding of the underlying market - which sectors and countries were long or short. This would assist with their trading strategies.
E3's Response
With [Global Energy Advisory] we developed an EU carbon market supply-and-demand model, covering:
Outcome
The client gained the knowledge to understand likely price discontinuities and market issues, as shown by the price collapse after the ‘unexpected' length in the market in April-May 2006.
back to top |
Background
The mechanics of emissions trading have been extensively analysed and debated in recent years. But in 2000, such policy was new to Australia, and indeed to many other countries.
The Clients
Eight Queensland-based businesses: Stanwell Corporation, Tarong Energy, Intergen, Ergon Energy, Energex, Queensland Cement, Southern Pacific Petroleum and Anglo Coal.
The Brief
To explore emission-trading schemes and assess the likely impact on their businesses.
E3's Response
E3 set-up the Queensland Emissions Trading Forum (QETF) for the eight members.
Aims
E3's role included:
Emission trading simulations and workshops
E3 also developed an internet-based emissions trading simulation platform. Over four years, the team ran 12 simulations - each with different emissions trading rules.
Policy-maker workshops were held after each simulation. Taking part were stakeholders from the Australian Greenhouse Office, Environment Victoria, the NSW Environmental Protection Authority and the Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage.
It was the first time that such a range of stakeholders had been brought together to address what at the time was a very contentious issue.
Outcome
back to top |
Background
At the time, there was debate about the merits of the government's decision not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, and some disagreement in the business sector about the best strategy for Australian companies.
The Client
A leading peak business body
The Brief
To prepare an impartial report on the issues facing Australian companies as they responded to the challenges and opportunities of climate change policy.
E3's Response
The report was not intended to recommend a policy position, or to define the pros and cons of ratifying the Kyoto Protocol.
It was intended to inform and engage a broad constituency of stakeholders faced with decisions in an uncertain policy environment.
The report took the form of a series of questions that companies were asking, followed by our considered responses. We addressed controversial questions, including:
E3 did an extensive literature review and canvassed a large number of stakeholders - many with conflicting views.
Outcome
The report was considered to be an impartial and frank discussion of the issues that many Australian companies were facing.
back to top |
Background
The group sought to stimulate debate in Australia between government, industry and the community. The aim was to determine appropriate policies and measures to trigger a transformation of the energy market towards low emission technologies, while leveraging national comparative advantage.
Given the importance of new technology in reversing greenhouse gas emissions, this is an area of lively debate. It poses some of the most difficult policy questions that government and business face.
The Client
The Australian Business and Climate Group: Anglo Coal, BP Australia, Deloitte, Mirvac, Rio Tinto, Santos, Swiss Re, VicSuper and Westpac.
E3's Response
E3 supported the group by:
Outcome
The research findings underpinned the Australian Business and Climate Group's report: Stepping Up: Accelerating the Deployment of Low Emission Technology in Australia. This called for a National Low Emission Technology Strategy to complement an Australian emissions trading scheme, to reduce Australia's greenhouse gas emissions.
back to top |
Background
Water scarcity is a global phenomenon and is causing tension in how water is allocated to competing uses and users. It is particularly pressing for hydropower generators in many parts of the world, who face risks as well as opportunities.
The Client
A major international hydropower company with a background in managing engineering infrastructure asset and facilities
The Brief
To develop a strategic response to opportunities in the emerging water sector.
E3 was commissioned to:
E3's Response
E3 produced an extensive literature review, consulted with a wide range of internal and external stakeholders, analysed the findings and facilitated several workshops.
Outcome
The project played a key role in informing the company's water strategy.
back to top |
Background
Co-firing biomass in coal-fired power stations is an entry-level opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the electricity sector. Its advantages include:
However, commercially viable co-firing requires an understanding of co-firing technology and economics, certification for creation of RECs, and the availability of acceptable biomass resources.
The Client
A major coal-fired generator
The Brief
To assist with developing and implementing a biomass co-firing strategy.
E3's Response
Our support included:
Outcome
Management was able to develop and advance the business case for biomass co-firing at the power station.
back to top |
Background
Demand side management (DSM) and distributed generation (DG) can play an important role in deferring or avoiding capital expenditure and improving the use of network assets. Many jurisdictions have requirements to consider these as alternatives to traditional network expansion. But so far, regulatory frameworks have not fully addressed the issue.
Interest in these approaches is further heightened by:
The Client
A leading Australian electricity network operator
The Brief
To provide advice on:
E3's Response
E3 addressed a range of issues, including:
Outcome
The project played a key role in facilitating consensus on how the company should implement its DSM and DG strategy.
back to top |
Background
Renewable energy certificates are emerging as a credible avenue for capturing the ‘green' value of renewable energy generation.
While the core value-drivers are clear, there has been debate on how retail products based on such certificates should be packaged, and what environmental claims (for example, reduction in greenhouse gas emissions) are justifiable.
The Client
A major renewable energy generator
The Brief
Explore strategies to unlock the value of its product.
E3's Response
E3 carried out a global study on current and expected regulatory mechanisms and market developments, key players (industry participants, regulators and major end users) and their perspectives and strategy options for creating value.
We canvassed a range of options including international cross-border trading, incorporating renewable energy within consumer products and developing a retail brand.
Outcome
The findings were studied at an internal stakeholder workshop, which facilitated consensus on the way forward.